Page Header Logo

Cover Page

Journal Content
Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
Atom logo
RSS2 logo
RSS1 logo
  • About the Journal
  • Aims and Scope
  • Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Review Process
  • Privacy Statement
  • Article Processing charges
  • Publication Ethics
  • Open Access
  • Copyright and License
  • Archive Policy
  • Plagiarism Policy

Template Cover Page Cover Page
Similarity Checker

Cover Page

Member of

Cover Page

Statistics


Flag Counter

  • Home
  • Current
  • Announcement
  • Archive
  • Editorial Team
  • Reviewers
  • Contact us
  • Search
Home > Articles

Metode RGEC dalam Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan LKMS di Indonesia Sebelum dan Semasa Pandemi Covid-19

  • Suhartono
    Universitas Terbuka

  • Selamet
    ITB Adias Pemalang


DOI: https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i4.764
Keywords: RGEC Method, Finance, KSPPS BMT SM NU Kramat, Corona Virus, Independent Differential Test

Abstract

The existence of a Sharia Financial Institution in recent years has become an alternative financial institution for society which is very important in advancing the real sector. This is because Sharia banks play a role in socializing the practice of profit sharing to avoid the practice of usury (interest). However, in 2019 - 2020 there was a virus that hit all countries in the world which caused the economy to decline. The corona virus (Covid-19) pandemic is still causing ongoing problems. Various sectors have also been affected by this outbreak, including Sharia Microfinance Institutions (IKMS). This research aims to test whether there are differences in the Health Level of Sharia Microfinance Institutions at KSPPS BMT SM NU Kramat Tegal before and during the Covid 19 Pandemic. The population of this research is KSPPS BMT SM NU Kramat. The research was tested using the independent sample t-test. The results of this research show that there are significant differences in NPL, LDR, ROA and CAR at KSPPS BMT SM NU Kramat before and during the Covid 19 pandemic. Meanwhile for GCG and NIM there are no significant differences at KSPPS BMT SM NU Kramat before and during the pandemic covid 19.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fauzan, M., Hardana, A., Anugrah Nasution, A., & Pasaribu, M. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Metode CAMELS Dan Metode RGEC dalam Menilai Tingkat Kesehatan PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah, Tbk. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 6(3), 778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v6i3.9998 .

Yuniati, E. yuniati, & Ari Pertiwi, D. (2021). Metode RGEC pada Tingkat Kesehatan Perbankan Syariah dan Perbankan Konvensional. JFAS : Journal of Finance and Accounting Studies, 3(1), 36–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33752/jfas.v3i1.263

Wulandari, I. (2018). Perbandingan Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC Pada Lima Bank yang Masuk Kategori Buku 4 di Indonesia Periode 2016. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana, 4(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26486/jramb.v4i1.435 .

Deviantika Fahriza, Ridho Kismawadi, E., & Basri. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah Tbk Sebelum dan Sesudah (IPO) (Initial Public Offering) dengan metode RGEC. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Statistik Indonesia, 2(1), 24–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/jesi.02.01.04 .

Yulianti, V., & Christianti, A. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank (Metode RBBR): Perbandingan Kelompok Bank Umum dan Buku. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Sriwijaya, 18(3), 161–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29259/jmbs.v18i3.12928 .

Sodik, F., Antika, R., Hidayat, A., Sulis Setyaningsih, T., & Ayuni, E. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah Menggunakan Metode RGEC. Jurnal Akunida, 9(1), 47–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30997/jakd.v9i1.7733 .

Arrizky, N. A. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum Syariah Sebelum dan Sesudah Terdampak Covid-19. Jurnal Proaksi, 9(4), 427–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32534/jpk.v9i4.3414 .

Achmad, A., & Faizul Muttaqin Anwar Musthofa, A. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Dalam Menilai Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Metode CAMELS dan RGEC (Studi pada Bank Umum BUMN yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2017-2021). Mazinda : Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Bisnis, 1(1), 11–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35316/mazinda.v1i1.2648 .

Habsyah, A., Nursanti, L., Peliansi, Y., & Panorama, M. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Bank Syariah dengan Metode Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital dan Islamic city Performance Index Periode 2016-2020. Jesya, 6(1), 13–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v6i1.830 .

Nasution, I. H. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Metode Rgec Pada Pt Bank Mandiri Tbk dan PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk Tahun 2016-2018. Jurnal Perspektif Manajerial dan Kewirausahaan (JPMK), 1(2), 218–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59832/jpmk.v1i2.31 .

Dewi, W. R., Saputera, D., & Prihatma, G. T. (2021). Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Perbankan Umum Syariah dan Perbankan Umum Konvensional Indonesia Menggunakan Motode Rged Sebelum dan Sesudah Penyebaran Pandemi Covid 19. Journal of Communication Education, 15(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.58217/joce-ip.v15i2.243 .

Ramadhanti, I., & Laila, N. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Menggunakan Rasio yang Terdapat Pada RGEC (Bank Devisa Konvensional dan Bank Devisa Syariah Periode 2014-2018). Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 7(7), 1362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/vol7iss20207pp1362-1377 .

Duwi Ira Setianti, & Slamet Haryono. (2023). Product Market Competition, Financial Leverage, Risk of Financing on Financial Stability: Studies on Islamic Banks in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 10(4), 365–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/vol10iss20234pp365-376 .

Haris, H., & Hastuti, N. S. (2013). Analisis Efisiensi Bank Umum Syariah Devisa di Indonesia dengan Metode Data Envelopment Analysis Studi Pada Bank Muamalat Indonesia dan Bank Syariah Mandiri. Muqtasid: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 4(1)., 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326 .

Fatica, S., Panzica, R., & Rancan, M. (2021). The Pricing Of Green Bonds: Are Financial Institutions Special?. Journal of Financial Stability, 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100873 .

Mishchenko, S., Naumenkova, S., Mishchenko, V., & Dorofeiev, D. (2021). Innovation Risk Management In Financial Institutions. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(1), 191–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(1).2021.16 .

Mahdi Sahi, A., Mahdi Sahi, A., Abbas, A. F., & F. A. Khatib, S. (2022). Financial Reporting Quality of Financial Institutions: Literature Review. Cogent Business and Management. Cogent OA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2135210 .

Gambetta, N., Azcárate-Llanes, F., Sierra-García, L., & García-Benau, M. A. (2021). Financial Institutions’ Risk Profile and Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147738 .

Jiang, F., Jiang, Z., & Kim, K. A. (2020, August 1). Capital Markets, Financial Institutions, and Corporate Finance In China. Journal of Corporate Finance. Elsevier B.V. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.001 .

Akkas, E., & Al Samman, H. (2022). Are Islamic Financial Institutions More Resilient Against The COVID-19 Pandemic In The GCC Countries?. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(2), 331–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-07-2020-0378 .

Download
Published
2023-12-31
Issue
Vol. 5, No. 4 (December 2023)
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Suhartono, & Selamet. (2023). Metode RGEC dalam Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan LKMS di Indonesia Sebelum dan Semasa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 5(4), 1436-1444. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i4.764
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



Indexing and Abstractions:

Published:

       Creative Commons License
       This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0).