The RGEC Method in Analyzing Bank Health: A Case Study of Bank Nagari
|
Keywords:
Bank Health, RGEC Method, Financial Performance, Good Corporate Governance, Risk Profile
AbstractThis study aims to analyze the health level of a bank using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital) at Bank Nagari during the 2020–2024 period. The RGEC method is a risk-based bank rating approach that evaluates bank performance through four main aspects: risk profile, corporate governance, profitability, and capital adequacy. This research employs a descriptive quantitative approach using secondary data obtained from the annual financial reports of Bank Nagari and official publications from the Financial Services Authority. The analysis is conducted by calculating financial ratios representing each RGEC component, including Non-Performing Loan and Loan to Deposit Ratio for Risk Profile, self-assessment for Good Corporate Governance, Return on Assets, Return on Equity, Net Interest Margin, and Operating Expenses to Operating Income for Earnings, as well as Capital Adequacy Ratio for Capital. The results indicate that overall, Bank Nagari’s health level is categorized as healthy to very healthy throughout the observation period. The Risk Profile shows significant improvement in NPL, which falls into the very healthy category, although LDR remains in the fairly healthy category. The GCG aspect demonstrates consistent performance in the healthy category. In terms of Earnings, most indicators are classified as very healthy, despite ROE requiring further improvement. Meanwhile, the Capital aspect shows a very strong condition, with CAR consistently in the very healthy category. In conclusion, Bank Nagari exhibits stable and strong performance; however, improvements are still needed in liquidity management, corporate governance, and capital utilization efficiency to achieve an optimal overall health level.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
ReferencesRini Dwiastutiningsih, Dadi Kuswandi, & Titah Ayu. (2022). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Metode RGEC pada PT Bank Central Asia, Tbk (BCA) Periode 2017-2021. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 1(3), 09–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56127/jekma.v1i3.297 . Wulandari, A., & Taufiqurahman, E. (2021). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) dengan Metode Rgec (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, Capital). Jurisma: Jurnal Riset Bisnis & Manajemen, 11(2), 137–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34010/jurisma.v11i2.3863 . Adenia Deffa Zhafira, & Ardhani, L. (2023). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank menggunakan Metode RGEC pada Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Periode 2020-2021. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 9(1), 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/jiap.v9i1.36693 . Harpeni, H., Isnaeni, N., & Aprizal, Y. Z. (2025). Pengaruh Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah Indonesia terhadap Corporate Social Responsibility dengan Metode RGEC Tahun 2021-2023. Jurnal Manajemen Terapan dan Keuangan, 13(05), 1828–1839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/jmk.v13i05.37757 . Nasir, M., Safaruddin, S., Prihatin, N., Humaira, F., & Abdullah, H. (2023). Analisis Kesehatan Bank Umum Syariah Berdasarkan Metode RGEC terhadap Profitabilitas di Indonesia. Moneter - Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 10(1), 54–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/moneter.v10i1.13424 . Asnaini, S. W., Radita, F. R., & Maesaroh, S. (2022). Pengaruh Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Metode Risk Based Bank Rating terhadap Kinerja Keuangan pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia. Journal of Communication Education, 16(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.58217/joce-ip.v16i2.273 . S, S. R. (2021). Analisis Peranan dan Strategi Komite Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan (KSSK) dalam Mencegah dan Menangani Krisis Sistem Keuangan. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 30(2), 128–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.30.2.128-146 . Hasibuan, A. F. H., Deli, N. P., Hudiya, Y., Selasi, D., & Amelia, A. (2023). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Syariah dan Fungsinya dalam Perbankan Syariah. Ecobankers: Journal of Economy and Banking, 4(2), 146–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47453/ecobankers.v4i2.1105 . Shi, X., & Yu, W. (2021). Analysis of Chinese Commercial Banks’ Risk Management Efficiency Based on the PCA-DEA Approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7306322 . Puteh, C. P., & Wiryawan, M. R. (2023). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Menggunakan Metode RGEC pada Bank BTN Syariah. Jurnal Dimamu, 3(1), 58–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32627/dimamu.v3i1.838 . Putu Dera Latsmi, & Henny Rahyuda. (2025). Pengaruh Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Berbasis Risk Profile terhadap Financial Distress Bank Umum KBMI 2 dan 3. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 14(9), 667–681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/ejmunud.2025.v14.i9.p01 Malfiandri, M., Zulkan, Z., & Malfiandri, M. (2025). Menakar Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Nasional: Analisis Dampak Dual Banking System di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Perpajakan dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan, 2(4), 1141–1150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70248/jakpt.v2i4.2206 . Etika, C. (2025). Stabilitas Keuangan Bank Syariah dan Faktor Makroekonomi di Indonesia. Jurnal Tabarru’: Islamic Banking and Finance, 8(1), 228–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/jtb.2025.vol8(1).22876 . Setiyono, W. P. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan. Umsida Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/2018/978-602-5914-38-6 . Wulansari, J., & Chandra, S. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Metode RGEC terhadap Kinerja Keuangan (ROA) Sektor Perbankan Konvensional yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2015-2020. Procuratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 10(3), 325–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35145/procuratio.v10i3.2655 . Yusuf, D., & Rohmadi, R. (2024). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Kinerja Keuangan terhadap Profitabilitas: Studi Kasus Perbankan Syari’ah di Indonesia Tahun 2020-2022. Perbanas Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 4(1), 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56174/pjieb.v4i1.234 . Sandy, R. M., & Mulya, A. S. (2025). Earnings Response Coefficient: Earnings Persistence Moderated by Capital Structure and Economic Growth. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2441475 . Maryati, W., Sukamdani, N. B., & Sukwika, T. (2025). Talent Management Analysis at PT Permodalan Nasional Madani Venture Capital. Jurnal Ekonomi Kreatif dan Manajemen Bisnis Digital, 4(2), 390–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55047/jekombital.v4i2.1070 . Kontuš, E., Šorić, K., & Šarlija, N. (2023). Capital Structure Optimization: A Model of Optimal Capital Structure from the Aspect of Capital Cost and Corporate Value. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 36(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2147565 . Al-Tit, A. A., Al-Ayed, S., Alhammadi, A., Hunitie, M., Alsarayreh, A., & Albassam, W. (2022). The Impact of Employee Development Practices on Human Capital and Social Capital: The Mediating Contribution of Knowledge Management. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040218 . |
Published
2026-05-14
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Suryadi, D., & Sari, P. I. P. (2026). The RGEC Method in Analyzing Bank Health: A Case Study of Bank Nagari. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 8(2), 355-361. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v8i2.1404
![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |


















