Page Header Logo

Cover Page

Journal Content
Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
Atom logo
RSS2 logo
RSS1 logo
  • About the Journal
  • Aims and Scope
  • Submission
  • Author Guidelines
  • Review Process
  • Privacy Statement
  • Article Processing charges
  • Publication Ethics
  • Open Access
  • Copyright and License
  • Archive Policy
  • Plagiarism Policy

Template Cover Page Cover Page
Similarity Checker

Cover Page

Member of

Cover Page

Statistics


Flag Counter

  • Home
  • Current
  • Announcement
  • Archive
  • Editorial Team
  • Reviewers
  • Contact us
  • Search
Home > Articles

Analisis Efisiensi Bank Umum Konvensional di Indonesia

  • Tania Dara Yewisa
    Universitas Negeri Padang

  • Alpon Satrianto
    Universitas Negeri Padang


DOI: https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v7i2.1130
Keywords: Efficiency, DEA, Conventional Commercial Banks, Bank Assets, CRS

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the efficiency level of conventional commercial banks in Indonesia based on asset classification during the 2019–2023 period. The method used is Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with a Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) approach. The sample consists of 29 banks, divided into two groups: 20 large-asset banks and 9 medium-asset banks. The input variables include fixed assets, equity, and operating expenses, while the output is net profit. The results show that large banks had a higher average efficiency than medium-sized banks. In 2023, the average efficiency score for large banks reached 0.7012, while medium-sized banks scored only 0.2917. The minimum efficiency scores for large and medium banks were 0.0475 and 0.0352, respectively. The percentage of large banks achieving optimal efficiency (DEA=1) ranged from 5% to 35%, while for medium banks it ranged from 5% to 22.2%. BCA and OCBC NISP consistently achieved efficiency and served as benchmarks for other banks. Differences in efficiency are influenced by business scale, technology adoption, and cost management. These findings provide a vital foundation for improving operational strategies and bank efficiency in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bank Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 14/15/PBI/2012 tentang Penilaian Kualitas Aset Bank Umum. Bank Indonesia, 1–101.

Belousova, V., Karminsky, A., Myachin, N., & Kozyr, I. (2021). Bank Ownership and Efficiency of Russian Banks. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(10), 2870–2887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1668764 .

Davidovic, M., Uzelac, O., & Zelenovic, V. (2019). Efficiency Dynamics of The Croatian Banking Industry: DEA investigation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32(1), 33–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1545596 .

Wahab, A., Hosen, M. N., & Muhari, S. (2015). Komparasi Efisiensi Teknis Bank Umum Konvensional (Buk) dan Bank Umum Syariah (Bus) di Indonesia dengan Metode Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Islamic Economics, 6(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/ijies.v6i2.1229 .

Komarudin, M., & Saepudin, S. (2021). Efisiensi Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Valuasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 1(1), 11–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46306/vls.v1i1.2 .

Wulandari, H. K. (2020). Analisis Kebijakan Akuntansi PSAK 16 tentang Aset Tetap Pada CV. Dian Ayu Setiabudi Brebes. Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 5(8), 565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v5i8.1528 .

R, B., Bintari, S., & S, S. (2020). Analisis Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Tetap pada Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah (BPKD). Economics and Digital Business Review, 1(1), 58–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37531/ecotal.v1i1.6 .

Hairunnisa, Y. I., Mulyantini, S., & Jubaedah, J. (2021). Analisis Profitabilitas Bank Umum Konvensional Sebelum dan Saat Pandemi Covid-19. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(10), 5398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i10.4355 .

Nuhadilah, A., & Laila, N. (2021). Penentu Profitabilitas Pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia: Faktor Internal Bank dan Makroekonomi. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 8(6), 797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/vol8iss20216pp797-807

Saputra, S., Komala, R., & Aryani, R. A. I. (2023). Fintech, Profitabilitas dan Efisiensi Bank Umum Konvensional di Indonesia. J-Aksi : Jurnal Akuntansi dan Sistem Informasi, 4(2), 214–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jaksi.v4i2.5523 .

Kusumaningsih, R. P., Mulyadi, J., Sihite, M., & Djaddang, S. (2023). Analisis Efisiensi Bank Pemerintah Indonesia dengan Data Envelopment Analysis-Dea. Jurnal Akunida, 9(2), 137–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30997/jakd.v9i2.11512 .

Koiri, A., & Erdkhadifa, R. (2022). Analisis Efisiensi dengan Data Envelopment Analysis Agressive dan Pengukuran Faktor-Faktor yang Diduga Berpengaruh terhadap Efisiensi Bank Syariah Bukopin. Jurnal Manajemen dan Keuangan, 11(1), 73–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33059/jmk.v11i1.5113 .

Naumovska, E., & Cvetkoska, V. (2016). Efficiency of the Macedonian Banking Sector. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 26(3), 317–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR150228019N .

Farchah, N., & Kusmargiani, I. S. (2020). Analisis Efisiensi Bank Umum Konvensional di Indonesia Menggunakan Metode Data Evelopment Analysis (Dea) pada Tahun 2014-2018. Keunis, 8(1), 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32497/keunis.v8i1.2135

Rahmawati, A. K., Sari, S. R. K., & Hermawan, H. (2019). Analisis Perbandingan Efisiensi Bank Umum Konvensional dan Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia. Akuntabilitas, 12(2), 191–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v12i2.12600 .

Mukaromah, N., & Supriono, S. (2020). Pengaruh Kecukupan Modal, Risiko Kredit, Efisiensi Operasional, dan Likuiditas terhadap Profitabilitas Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015–2017. Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology, 3(1), 67–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32500/jematech.v3i1.1082 .

Ningsih, D. W., Suripto, S., Erfandi, E., & Murdianingsih, D. (2023). Analisis Efisiensi Bank Umum Persero Menggunakan Metode Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Magisma: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 11(2), 172–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35829/magisma.v11i2.324 .

Monica Sari, P., Bahrudin, Moh., & Nurmalia, G. (2020). Studi Komparatif Analisis Efisiensi Kinerja Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia Antara Metode Data Envelopment Analysis (Dea) dan Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA). Fidusia: Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/jf.v3i1.468 .

Riani, D., & Hendrawan, S. (2020). Data Envelopment Analysis (Dea): Perbandingan Efisiensi Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional Periode 2014-2018. Neraca Keuangan : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 15(2), 25–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32832/neraca.v15i2.3498 .

Hasanah, U., & Serly, V. (2019). Analisis Perbandingan Efisiensi, Kualitas Aset, dan Stabilitas Bank Umum Konvensional dan Bank Umum Syariah yang Melakukan Pemisahan (Spin-Off) di Indonesia Periode Tahun 2013-2017. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 1(3), 1411–1425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v1i3.151 .

Download
Published
2025-05-17
Issue
Vol. 7, No. 2 (June 2025)
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Yewisa, T. D., & Satrianto, A. (2025). Analisis Efisiensi Bank Umum Konvensional di Indonesia. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 7(2), 195-200. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v7i2.1130
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



Indexing and Abstractions:

Published:

       Creative Commons License
       This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0).