Relevansi Fraud Hexagon Theory terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Sektor Perbankan di Indonesia Tahun 2017-2021
|
Keywords:
Fraud Hexagon Theory, Financial Statement Fraud, Banking, Collusion, Agency Theory
AbstractThis research aims to analyze the relevance of Fraud Hexagon Theory to financial statement fraud in the banking sector in Indonesia in 2017-2021. Agency theory explains that management has the ability to gain a lot of benefits for itself, so that management no longer acts in the interests of the principal, one way is through collusion. This research shows that financial target, external pressure, financial stability, director change, CEO photo change, and e-procement have a positive and significant effect on financial report fraud, while change in auditor and ineffective monitoring have a negative and insignificant effect on financial report fraud. Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
ReferencesChristina, L., & Septian, S. B. (2019). Mendeteksi Perilaku Fraud Laporan Keuangan dengan Theory Of Planned Behavior (Studi Empiris Pada Industri Perbankan). Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 11(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/jako.v11i1.2071 . Lutfina, E., & Huda, S. (2021). Peningkatan Akurasi Pembobotan Attribute importance weights Pada Deteksi Fraud. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, 14(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/jik.2021.v14.i01.p01 . Pikahulan, R. M. (2020). Implementasi Fungsi Pengaturan serta Pengawasan pada Bank Indonesia dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) terhadap Perbankan. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1103 . Syatiri, A., & Hamdaini, Y. (2018). Risiko Kredit, Stabilitas, dan Kebijakan Pembiayaan Bank Syariah di Indonesia. JURNAL MANAJEMEN DAN BISNIS SRIWIJAYA, 15(3), 146–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29259/jmbs.v15i3.5715 . Siti Marha Athirah, & Handri. (2022). Pengaruh Risiko Perbankan terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Bandung Conference Series: Business and Management, 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsbm.v2i1.2454 . Padgett, S. (2015). About the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners and the Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. In Profiling the Fraudster (pp. 239–242). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118929773.oth1 . Kesuma, N., Gozali, E., & Syathiri, A. (2018). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Index Terhadap Risk-Taking dan Dinamika Bisnis Perbankan di Indonesia. JURNAL MANAJEMEN DAN BISNIS SRIWIJAYA, 15(2), 106–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29259/jmbs.v15i2.5698 . Meirene, M., & Karyani, E. (2017). Risk Governance And Performance: Research On Indonesian And Malaysian Banking. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 20(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.375 . Clinard, M. B., & Cressey, D. R. (1954). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. American Sociological Review, 19(3), 362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2087778 . Nurhayati, N., Muliani, M., & Septian, D. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Diamond terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Riset, Ekonomi, Akuntansi dan Perpajakan (Rekan), 3(1), 55–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30812/rekan.v3i1.1862 . Ma, J., Tse, Y. K., Zhang, M., & MacBryde, J. (2022). Quality risk and responsive actions in sourcing/procurement: an empirical study of food fraud cases in the UK. Production Planning and Control. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2022.2080125 . Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128 . Kusumosari, L., & Solikhah, B. (2021). Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Fraud Hexagon Theory. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(3), 753–767. https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v4i3.735 Somantri, G. R. (2005). Memahami Metode Kualitatif. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 9(2), 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v9i2.122 . Anggraini, D., S.A., P., & Wulandari, D. A. (2019). Analisis Ekonomi Pengendalian Sedimentasi Waduk Mrica. Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 4(4), 567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v4i4.378 . Yulianty, P. D., & Jufri, A. (2020). Perdebatan Empiris : Prinsip Metode Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Untuk Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi. Value : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 15(2), 164–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32534/jv.v15i2.1291 . Hardianto Zainal, N. F. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Talk Write (Ttw) dan Tipe Think Pair Share (Tps) Pada Mata Kuliah Statistik Ekonomi I di Program Studi Ekonomi Manajemen Stimi Meulaboh. Gammath : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32528/gammath.v6i1.5397 . Risa Nadila Agustina, Yulinartati, & Nina Mariana. (2023). Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud. JRAK (Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis), 9(1), 60–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38204/jrak.v9i1.929 . Suhendah, R. (2019). Determinan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Account, 6(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32722/acc.v6i2.2481 . Indira Shinta Dewi. (2021). Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dalam Perspektif Fraud Triangle. Jurnal Liabilitas, 6(2), 16–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54964/liabilitas.v6i2.76 . |
Published
2023-08-21
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Barezki, M. B., Fuadah, L. L., & Yulianita, A. (2023). Relevansi Fraud Hexagon Theory terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Sektor Perbankan di Indonesia Tahun 2017-2021. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 5(3), 927-931. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i3.650
 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
